1 month ago
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin Supreme Court justices questioned Wednesday really overmuch powerfulness legislative committees should wield, successful a lawsuit that Democratic Gov. Tony Evers brought against nan Republican-controlled Legislature and that could person a awesome effect connected really authorities government functions.
A ruling successful favour of Evers would upend decades-old practices successful nan Legislature and make it easier to o.k. projects successful a onshore stewardship program. But justices echoed concerns raised by Republicans that nan lawsuit could person acold broader impacts connected nan separation of powerfulness betwixt nan executive and legislative branches.
LIBERAL JUSTICE'S RETIREMENT PUTS WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT MAJORITY BACK ON BALLOT
Siding pinch Evers would "overturn really our authorities government has functioned for almost a century," Misha Tseytlin, a lawyer for nan Legislature, told nan court.
The entranceway to nan Wisconsin Supreme Court chambers is seen successful nan authorities Capitol successful Madison, Wis. March 14, 2024. The Wisconsin Supreme Court is scheduled to perceive arguments connected Wednesday, April 17, 2024, successful Democratic Gov. Tony Evers’ suit against nan Republican-controlled Legislature, arguing that it is unconstitutionally blocking backing for a authorities conservation program. (Todd Richmond/AP Photo)
But wide Justice Jill Karofsky, successful deflecting arguments that nan tribunal should not overturn specified established practices, said "Maybe they’ve been incorrect for nan past period and we shouldn’t double down connected really incorrect this is."
Evers argues that nan Legislature’s powerful budget-writing Joint Finance Committee, which is controlled 12-4 by Republicans, is exceeding its law lawmaking authority and efficaciously acting arsenic a 4th branch of government. The Legislature counters that nan committee's powers, including nan support of definite authorities conservation projects, are good established successful authorities rule and tribunal precedent.
Karofsky questioned whether nan fund committee had excessively overmuch power.
"There doesn't look to maine to beryllium immoderate limits whatsoever," she said. "There are zero guardrails here."
If nan tribunal sides pinch Evers, past galore different functions of nan fund committee, nan authorities building committee and different legislative committees that person been successful spot for a period would besides beryllium unconstitutional, Tseytlin said.
Conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley questioned whether nan court's ruling would use crossed a myriad of legislative committees and their powers.
"You're asking america to make a large shift," she said, adding that nan tribunal can't "slice and dice separation of powers" betwixt nan executive and legislative branches.
"Either we're going to use it strictly aliases we're not," she said.
Liberal Justice Ann Walsh Bradley echoed immoderate concerns raised by blimpish justices.
"Your position seems to beryllium achromatic and white: Once nan Legislature has passed a bill, hands off," she said to Evers' attorney. "Isn't location immoderate nuance to nan position, immoderate benignant of limitations connected your black-and-white argument? It seems to maine location should be."
Evers' lawyer Colin Roth said nan constitution is clear that erstwhile nan Legislature passes a law, it is up to nan executive branch to transportation it out. The Legislature is overreaching its authority erstwhile committees tin veto actions specified arsenic nan support of stewardship projects, he said.
Evers, speaking astir nan lawsuit connected Tuesday, said nan authorities Supreme Court needs to admit that nan Legislature's fund committee has been acting arsenic a 4th branch of authorities and should beryllium reined in.
"The thought that someway they person nan expertise to fundamentally activity arsenic a 4th limb of our authorities is conscionable wrong," Evers told reporters.
The suit cites nan committee’s rejection of dozens of conservation projects selected by nan Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources nether nan Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program.
The Legislature created nan stewardship programme successful 1989. It provides backing chiefly to section governments, conservation groups and nan DNR to acquisition blocks of onshore to sphere earthy areas and wildlife habitat, protect h2o value and fisheries, and grow outdoor recreational opportunities. Supporters herald it arsenic a measurement to further protect earthy areas from development.
Republicans person been trying for years to standard backmost stewardship purchases, complaining that they return excessively overmuch onshore disconnected nan taxation rolls, rob bluish Wisconsin municipalities of gross and thrust up authorities debt.
Legislative oversight of nan programme accrued arsenic concerns grew astir nan scope and costs of nan stewardship program.
The Legislature did its occupation erstwhile it passed laws creating and backing nan program, attorneys for Evers reason successful tribunal filings. But nan fund committee's expertise to artifact support of stewardship projects, fundamentally vetoing decisions of nan executive branch, is an unconstitutional separation of powers violation, they say.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Conservative Chief Justice Annette Ziegler questioned whether nan lawsuit should beryllium put connected clasp truthful nan tribunal could stitchery much facts and return a broader look astatine legislative and executive powers.
"Why unreserved this case?" she asked.
The tribunal will rumor a ruling successful nan adjacent respective weeks aliases months.
