3 weeks ago
The Supreme Court is group to see arguably nan highest-profile cases of nan word Thursday to find whether erstwhile President Trump tin declare statesmanlike immunity against criminal charges brought by nan Biden Justice Department.
Special Counsel Jack Smith, who brought charges against Trump pursuing his investigation into nan Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and Trump's alleged crippled to overturn nan 2020 predetermination result, based on successful briefs submitted to nan precocious tribunal that "presidents are not supra nan law."
Trump's ineligible squad conversely argued, "A denial of criminal immunity would incapacitate each early President…[t]he threat of early prosecution and imprisonment would go a governmental cudgel to power nan astir delicate and arguable decisions, taking distant nan strength, authority, and decisiveness of nan Presidency."
Legal experts told Fox News Digital that while each 9 justices mightiness beryllium skeptical of Trump's sweeping immunity claims, they are apt to springiness guidance connected wherever statesmanlike immunity from criminal prosecution ends for actions taken while successful nan Oval Office – which could person a profound effect successful nan criminal cases against nan erstwhile president.
SUPREME COURT PREPARES TO DEBATE TRUMP IMMUNITY CLAIM IN ELECTION INTERFERENCE CASE
The U.S. Supreme Court justices will perceive arguments successful Trump v. United States connected Thursday. (Collection of nan Supreme Court of nan United States via Getty Images)
Jonathan Turley, a practicing criminal defense lawyer and professor astatine George Washington University, told Fox News Digital nan lawsuit is "surrounded by alternatively steep law cliffs."
"This lawsuit whitethorn beryllium alternatively maddening for nan justices because it is surrounded by alternatively steep law cliffs. If nan tribunal goes 1 way, a president has small protection successful carrying retired nan duties of his office. If they turned nan different way, he has a small accountability for nan astir superior criminal acts," Turley said.
"This is simply a tribunal that tends to beryllium incremental. They thin not to favour sweeping rulings," he said.
The Justice Department based on successful little tribunal that a president has virtually nary immunity erstwhile he leaves office, and nan little tribunal agreed.
Turley says nan justices "could cull nan little tribunal determination and nonstop it backmost for a much nuanced attack connected law immunity."
"The justices whitethorn find that presidents do require immunity, moreover pinch respect to immoderate criminal acts," Turley said, adding that "any remand would activity importantly successful nan erstwhile president's favour connected a tactical level."
Turley explained that if nan lawsuit were to beryllium remanded backmost down to Judge Tanya Chutkan successful nan D.C. District Court, that process would make a proceedings earlier nan November predetermination "even little likely."
"There are some law and tactical aspects to nan ruling, but I deliberation these justices are apt to attack this statement pinch an oculus toward balancing these interests, and if that's nan case, they could good travel up pinch a different attack than nan little tribunal aliases nan erstwhile president," Turley said.
LEGAL EXPERTS SAY JACK SMITH’S RUNWAY TO TRY TRUMP BEFORE 2024 ELECTION ‘JUST GOT A LOT SHORTER’
The thrust of Trump's ineligible statement is that Supreme Court precedent says absolute immunity from civilian liability exists for a erstwhile president for his charismatic acts, and that nan aforesaid immunity should use to a criminal context.
"There’s a existent likelihood that nan Supreme Court will springiness immoderate actual guidance connected nan nonstop magnitude of protection a president is entitled to," Jim Trusty, erstwhile ineligible counsel for Trump and a former national prosecutor, told Fox News Digital.
"There are still apt to beryllium actual issues that nan little courts will past person to determine arsenic to wherever President Trump’s actions fresh wrong this continuum of protected aliases unprotected conduct," he explained.
Former President Trump and Special Counsel Jack Smith (Getty Images/File)
John Shu, a law rule master who served successful some nan George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush administrations, gave a akin view.
"The chances of nan Supreme Court giving nan agency of nan president immoderate magnitude of level of immunity are beautiful good," Shu told Fox News Digital.
But Shu besides said "there's besides a decent chance that immoderate immunity nan tribunal carves out, it whitethorn not encompass Trump’s alleged acts."
RED STATE AGS BLAST SPECIAL COUNSEL PUSH FOR SCOTUS TO RUSH TRUMP CASE: ‘PARTISAN INTERESTS’
Former President Trump (Win McNamee/Getty Images/File)
"They won’t beryllium making purely ineligible arguments, but governmental powerfulness arguments arsenic well, and they’ll person to get astatine slightest 5 Supreme Court justices to work together pinch them," Shu said.
Trusty said nan questions put to each of nan parties successful Thursday's oral arguments "could beryllium beautiful transparent arsenic to each justice’s position of immunity."
So far, Shu observed, Trump’s attorneys person based on that nan president has absolute immunity, moreover aft he leaves office, for immoderate and each acts.
"I don’t deliberation nan tribunal will spell that far," Shu said.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Similarly, Trusty said he expects nan tribunal to "give very small in installments to nan conception of perfectly unlimited immunity, arsenic President Trump’s lawyers person argued."
"But I do deliberation location is simply a beardown anticipation that nan tribunal confirms nan conception that immunity protects nan president and that their ruling could group successful mobility nan eventual dismissal of nan Jan. 6, Mar-a-Lago and Georgia cases," he said.
The Supreme Court will perceive nan case, Trump v. United States, connected Thursday astatine 10 a.m.
The Justice Department declined to comment.
Trump run spokesperson Steven Cheung said successful a statement, "Without immunity for charismatic acts, location tin beryllium nary Presidency. No President successful American history has faced prosecution for his charismatic acts — until now."
"Allowing governmental opponents to prosecute nan President erstwhile he leaves agency will distort nan President’s astir important decisions. Even during his Presidency, his enemies will blackmail and extort him pinch threats of lawless criminal charges and imprisonment erstwhile his word ends. The Framers of our Constitution wisely created a strategy that prevented this endless, destructive rhythm of recrimination for 234 years," he continued.
"The Supreme Court should uphold Presidential immunity and put an extremity to Jack Smith’s deranged, unconstitutional witch hunt against President Trump, erstwhile and for all," he said.
Brianna Herlihy is simply a authorities writer for Fox News Digital.
