Movie Review: ‘Food, Inc. 2’ revisits food system, sees reason for frustration and a little hope

Trending 1 month ago

The makers of nan influential 2008 documentary “Food, Inc.” ne'er planned to make a sequel. They figured they’d said it each successful their harrowing look astatine a broken, unsustainable nutrient strategy — a strategy led, they argued, by a fewer multinational corporations whose monopoly squeezes retired section farmers, mistreats animals, workers and nan ungraded itself, and makes each of america little healthy.

But 16 years aft that Oscar-nominated film, they’re backmost pinch “Food, Inc. 2.” What happened? Well, first of all, nan pandemic — an arena that some strained our nutrient strategy and revealed its precariousness, they say.

Also, nan filmmakers suggest, it was possibly naive to presume that informed, ethical shoppers could unsocial reverse specified an entrenched narrative. “You tin alteration nan world pinch each bite,” nan first movie had argued, urging consumers to bargain section and organic, patronize farmer’s markets, request patient schoolhouse lunches and astir of all, publication labels and understand what they’re eating.

Now, overmuch of that is happening. But immoderate problems person worsened, and caller ones person emerged. “We really thought we could alteration nan strategy 1 wound astatine a time,” says investigative writer and shaper Michael Pollan (“The Omnivore’s Dilemma”), who’s backmost pinch predominant commentary on pinch chap author/producer Eric Schlosser (“Fast Food Nation”). “As important arsenic that is, it’s not enough.”

Directed by Robert Kenner and Melissa Robledo, nan caller movie begins, arsenic did nan first, pinch an inspiring image retired of a coating — here, a tractor gliding on a section of crops nether a glistening sun. If you’ve seen nan original, you’ll cognize specified a segment will soon output to images of unsavory assembly lines, “kill floors” astatine slaughterhouses, aliases workers earning pennies successful fields.

A batch has happened since 2008. More group are willing successful what they’re eating and wherever it’s from. Farmer’s markets are everywhere, and supermarkets transportation integrated and GMO-free food, because consumers want it.

But, Pollan reminds us, nan manufacture is still dominated “by a fistful of very ample and very powerful companies.” In normal times this powerfulness is invisible, but erstwhile nan pandemic hit, nan curtain was peeled back, he says. We spot images of countless hogs euthanized because they couldn’t beryllium processed, and farms disposing of perfectly bully milk. At nan aforesaid time, galore supermarket shelves were empty, and group lined up successful their cars, hungry. This, nan movie argues, is what happens erstwhile only a fewer companies are successful charge. Some babies don’t get their formula, for example.

As pinch nan first movie — nan style is very overmuch nan aforesaid — we’re taken crossed nan state (and beyond), listening to a watercourse of voices: organizers, workers, farmers, nutritionists, politicians, entrepreneurs, scientists. (Occasionally we don’t cognize who’s talking for a fewer seconds, which tin beryllium confusing.)

In Immokalee, Florida, lifelong farmworker (and labour leader) Gerardo Reyes Chavez explains really migrant workers — mostly Latino and Haitians — are some relied upon and mistreated. “The manufacture wants migrant workers because they consciousness they tin return advantage of us,” he says. If we’re eating fruits and vegetables, Schlosser and Pollan show us, we’re portion of a concatenation of exploitation.

With flashy, colorful and user-friendly graphics, nan movie traces manufacture consolidation: nan fewer companies who person 70% of nan carbonated drinks market, for example, aliases 80% of nan babe nutrient market. Such realities break nan tone of antitrust legislation, they argue.

We meet group for illustration Wisconsin dairy husbandman Sarah Lloyd, whose 450-cow workplace feels immense to her, but different farms person 5,000 aliases 10,000 aliases 20,000 cows. How tin she compete?

Marion Nestle, biologist and nutritionist astatine New York University, looks backmost a fewer decades and marvels astatine really nutrient has has go thing disposable anytime, anywhere: “You spell into a clothing shop and location are candy bars astatine nan checkout counter.” She particularly marvels astatine nan escalating information size complete nan years, a thought illustrated by a stack of pancakes that keeps connected growing.

A professor successful Brazil, Carlos Monteiro, posits that “ultra-processed” foods are a cardinal facet successful diabetes. His ideas are borne retired by an research astatine nan National Institutes of Health that shows group who eat specified highly processed foods devour a whopping 500 much calories per day. Mark Schatzker (“The Dorito Effect”) talks astir artificial flavors and really they instrumentality nan assemblage into eating more.

Are location solutions to each this? The filmmakers see a bunch, approving of immoderate much than others. Everyone’s coming up pinch “plant-based” substitutes (fake chickenhearted wings, chromatic without bees.) But Pollan worries consumers mightiness deliberation “plant-based” intends patient nutrient — often, it’s thing of nan kind. One promising idea: An water farmer, Bren Smith, is farming kelp, and a cook is utilizing it successful her restaurant.

The astir affectional infinitesimal concerns Taco Bell, but not nan nutrient there. Fran Marion, a Taco Bell worker (and activist) has a tear streaming down her look arsenic she describes nan situation of feeding her children and avoiding surviving retired of her car. She does not get wellness attraction aliases sick leave, she says, and arsenic an big has ne'er been capable to spend seeing a doctor. She speaks of moving each time pinch nutrient and coming location to perceive her son’s tummy growl.

The movie ends wherever nan past 1 did: pinch a telephone to action. “Join america successful transforming our nutrient system,” it says, providing a website wherever viewers tin get involved. The threat is nan same, they say, arsenic it was backmost successful 2008: “Monopoly powerfulness is simply a threat to our freedom.”

“Food, Inc. 2,” a Magnolia Pictures release, is unrated by nan Motion Picture Association. Running time: 94 minutes. Three stars retired of four.

More
Source apnews.com
apnews.com