3 weeks ago
Nottingham Forest should person been awarded 1 punishment from their 3 unsuccessful appeals against Everton, an independent sheet has said.
Claims for penalties aft Ashley Young's situation connected Gio Reyna, his handball and past an attempted tackle connected Callum Hudson-Odoi were each turned down by Anthony Taylor connected nan pitch, pinch video adjunct referee Stuart Attwell not intervening.
Forest lost nan Premier League crippled 2-0 astatine Goodison Park connected 21 April.
Minutes aft full-time nan nine posted connected societal media, alleging Attwell was a instrumentality of relegation rivals Luton - a connection which has been seen much than 45 cardinal times.
Forest's station said: "Three highly mediocre decisions - 3 penalties not fixed - which we simply cannot accept.
"We warned nan PGMOL that nan VAR is simply a Luton fan... NFFC will now see its options."
The Key Match Incident Panel is independent and made up of 3 erstwhile players aliases coaches, 1 Premier League typical and 1 from nan Professional Game Match Officials Board, nan referees' body.
It reviews nan large refereeing decisions from each Premier League information of fixtures and unanimously agreed Forest should person been fixed a punishment erstwhile Young brought down Hudson-Odoi successful nan 55th minute.
"Young inherits nan consequence by going to crushed from nan incorrect broadside and Hudson-Odoi thumps him to nan ball. It is simply a foul," nan sheet wrote successful their decisions, seen by BBC Sport.
"It was felt unanimously that a punishment should person been awarded and VAR should person intervened connected nan ground that Young doesn't make immoderate interaction connected nan shot and that location is grounds that his interaction pinch Hudson-Odoi has nan consequence of tripping nan attacker."
They besides voted 5-0 that VAR should person intervened.
The sheet was divided 3-2 complete nan on-pitch determination complete whether Forest should person been awarded a spot-kick erstwhile nan shot deed Young's limb successful nan 44th minute, but each agreed VAR was correct not to intervene.
They based on it was a subjective telephone but "the mostly considered this a move business wherever nan limb was successful a justifiable position, and pinch nary clear action to deliberately grip nan ball. In summation nan adjacent proximity from which nan shot was played by nan attacker was taken into account."
They besides agreed, successful a 5-0 decision, that Young's 24th-minute situation connected Reyna did not warrant a punishment and that VAR was correct not to measurement in.
The sheet wrote: "The shot isn't played, location is interaction by nan defender connected nan attacker but immoderate interaction is minimal and is exaggerated by nan attacker, and falls beneath nan precocious period for a penalty."
Forest are expected to look charges from nan Premier League and Football Association pursuing their societal media post.
Last week nan FA formally asked for observations from Forest, leader Nuno Espirito Santo, defender Neco Williams and Mark Clattenburg, nan club's referee analysist, pursuing their comments.
The Premier League is besides investigating, saying it was "never due to improperly mobility nan integrity of lucifer officials".
Forest person been allowed to perceive to nan audio signaling of nan officials' discussions aft nan incidents.
It follows Liverpool’s akin petition erstwhile Luis Diaz’s extremity was incorrectly disallowed successful their 2-1 conclusion astatine Tottenham successful September.
Forest are 1 constituent supra nan Premier League's bottommost 3 aft Sunday's 2-0 conclusion by Manchester City and recreation to relegated Sheffield United connected Saturday.
